<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese researchers show how the PRC &#8220;owns&#8221; the U.S. Power Grid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/2009/09/14/chinese-researchers-show-how-the-prc-owns-the-us-power-grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/2009/09/14/chinese-researchers-show-how-the-prc-owns-the-us-power-grid/</link>
	<description>dispositions of an enemy are ascertained by spies, and spies alone - Mei Yao-ch`en</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: InfoBore 48 &#171; ubiwar . conflict in n dimensions</title>
		<link>http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/2009/09/14/chinese-researchers-show-how-the-prc-owns-the-us-power-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>InfoBore 48 &#171; ubiwar . conflict in n dimensions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/?p=637#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>[...] cyber, infobore, internet, links    Chinese Researchers Show How the PRC &#8216;Owns&#8217; the US Power Grid &#8211; Jeff Carr, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cyber, infobore, internet, links    Chinese Researchers Show How the PRC &#8216;Owns&#8217; the US Power Grid &#8211; Jeff Carr, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/2009/09/14/chinese-researchers-show-how-the-prc-owns-the-us-power-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/?p=637#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>Hey Nart, always nice to hear from you. I also noticed a historical precedent in past research but I&#039;m not an engineer and can&#039;t comment on how similar or different this new research is, however DHS apparently found it significant enough to begin work on mitigating the risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nart, always nice to hear from you. I also noticed a historical precedent in past research but I&#8217;m not an engineer and can&#8217;t comment on how similar or different this new research is, however DHS apparently found it significant enough to begin work on mitigating the risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nart</title>
		<link>http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/2009/09/14/chinese-researchers-show-how-the-prc-owns-the-us-power-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Nart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/?p=637#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>This paper was available on March 16, 2009 yet New Scientist posts the article on September 11, 2009 -- not likely a coincidence.

To me it looks like the paper simply took data (4941 nodes and 6594 edges) from a 1998 paper by Watts and Strogatz who got their data from a 1988 book by Phadke and Thorp.

The conclusion that it is better to attack nodes under light load rather than those under heavily load to improve chanced of a cascading failure is interesting. 

But nothing remotely close to owning the power grid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper was available on March 16, 2009 yet New Scientist posts the article on September 11, 2009 &#8212; not likely a coincidence.</p>
<p>To me it looks like the paper simply took data (4941 nodes and 6594 edges) from a 1998 paper by Watts and Strogatz who got their data from a 1988 book by Phadke and Thorp.</p>
<p>The conclusion that it is better to attack nodes under light load rather than those under heavily load to improve chanced of a cascading failure is interesting. </p>
<p>But nothing remotely close to owning the power grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
